This is my Haus.

Ask me anything   Andy. 22. Theatre Major at SSU. Expect video games, Gaga, Anime, Mass Effect, TF2, Pop Music, Japanese Pop Culture, League of Legends, Animals, Apple Products, and men.

americxanhorrorstory:

Round 3 ding ding ding…

(Source: , via ballsandbutts)

— 4 days ago with 8012 notes

jjinttagateun:

bipolarshinji:

hbnic:

gingersofficial:

tessaviolet:

w.h.a.t.

The fucking first time

I ALMOST CHOKED

i will reblog this every single time it shows up and if you don’t u dont have a heart

Nana does NOT give a shit she just does not she looks that good and she’s wearing fucking kimbap on her head and she just does not give a fuck

(Source: b-bumb, via thatxlavenderxblonde)

— 4 days ago with 98910 notes

Lady Gaga in Alexandre Vauthier for EAU DE GAGA.

Lady Gaga in Alexandre Vauthier for EAU DE GAGA.

(Source: amenvenus, via inlovewithgaga)

— 4 days ago with 1942 notes
Old pictures

tchaikogret:

This is Barack Obama in his basket team

image

 

Arnold Schwarzenegger discovering New York for the first time

image

Filming the roaring lion for Metro Goldwyn Mayer

image

Elijah Wood and Macaulay Culkin image

Les Beatles and Muhammad Ali

image

 Chuck Norris and Bruce Lee

image

 Marilyn Monroe meeting Elisabeth II

image

Stephen Hawking and his wife, Jane

image

Steven Spielberg in his mecanic shark for the movie “Jaws”

image

Robin Williams as a cheerleader

image

Behind the scene of Star Wars

image

(via brony-friendzoney-420)

— 4 days ago with 213933 notes
chescaleigh:

i-hate-the-beach:

heylasfas:

urulokid:

millika:

Who’s Alex?
Billboard demonstrating gender stereotypes as most people automatically assume that Alex is the boy.

Actually, I’ve studied design and advertising, and I can tell you that the reason people would look at this and immediately assume Alex is the boy is because, quite simply, the boy is the focal point of the ad.
English-speaking readers’ line of sight goes from left to right and up to down. This ad leads the viewer from the words MEET ALEX etc straight to the boy and then over and down to the girl. I didn’t even notice there was a set of parenthesis with words in them in the ad until I looked the fourth time. 
This is a fallacious confirmation bias, as anyone looking at it will assume Alex is the focal point (i.e. The Boy) and then if they’re perceptive they’ll notice the words at the bottom. Aha! Those damn gender stereotypes gotcha again! Except no, because the ad literally forces you to read it as “Alex is the boy” by the visual language and lines of sight. 
A better ad would have been structured from top to bottom instead of left to right, and wouldn’t have pushed the girl, the real subject of the ad (who, by the way, has been VISUALLY PUSHED OUT OF HER RIGHTFUL SPACE ON THE AD BY HER BROTHER) off to the corner as far away from her identifiers as possible. 
Here, I’ll make you a better ad.

Bam. Shitty stock photo but you get the point. If anyone sees this and assumes Alex is the boy, they don’t have the the ad layout to use as an excuse for their internalized gender shittery. Likewise, the ad isn’t actively trying to make you read it a certain way and THEN making you feel guilty for interpreting it the way they designed it to be. 

y’all jerks need to take a few design courses, good on you urulokid for bringin’ forth the knowledge

Thankyou!

I’m also side eyeing them putting the footnote in white without a drop shadow or SOMETHING to make it stand out. It’s a billboard for goodnessakes! Who the heck is going to see that tiny line of text while driving down the highway? The least they could’ve done was put it on top of the grey so it would stand out instead of on the kids. That’s intro to graphic design. 

chescaleigh:

i-hate-the-beach:

heylasfas:

urulokid:

millika:

Who’s Alex?

Billboard demonstrating gender stereotypes as most people automatically assume that Alex is the boy.

Actually, I’ve studied design and advertising, and I can tell you that the reason people would look at this and immediately assume Alex is the boy is because, quite simply, the boy is the focal point of the ad.

English-speaking readers’ line of sight goes from left to right and up to down. This ad leads the viewer from the words MEET ALEX etc straight to the boy and then over and down to the girl. I didn’t even notice there was a set of parenthesis with words in them in the ad until I looked the fourth time. 

This is a fallacious confirmation bias, as anyone looking at it will assume Alex is the focal point (i.e. The Boy) and then if they’re perceptive they’ll notice the words at the bottom. Aha! Those damn gender stereotypes gotcha again! Except no, because the ad literally forces you to read it as “Alex is the boy” by the visual language and lines of sight. 

A better ad would have been structured from top to bottom instead of left to right, and wouldn’t have pushed the girl, the real subject of the ad (who, by the way, has been VISUALLY PUSHED OUT OF HER RIGHTFUL SPACE ON THE AD BY HER BROTHER) off to the corner as far away from her identifiers as possible. 

Here, I’ll make you a better ad.

image

Bam. Shitty stock photo but you get the point. If anyone sees this and assumes Alex is the boy, they don’t have the the ad layout to use as an excuse for their internalized gender shittery. Likewise, the ad isn’t actively trying to make you read it a certain way and THEN making you feel guilty for interpreting it the way they designed it to be. 

y’all jerks need to take a few design courses, good on you urulokid for bringin’ forth the knowledge

Thankyou!

I’m also side eyeing them putting the footnote in white without a drop shadow or SOMETHING to make it stand out. It’s a billboard for goodnessakes! Who the heck is going to see that tiny line of text while driving down the highway? The least they could’ve done was put it on top of the grey so it would stand out instead of on the kids. That’s intro to graphic design. 

(via primeribofamerica)

— 4 days ago with 349637 notes